ALERT: A company called Loan4Help is commiting fraud by pretending to be a trading company of Finance & Credit Corporation Ltd.
They are nothing to do with us and are asking clients for up front fees. You should report Loan4Help to Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040.

Bridging LoansClear & Simple

Fincorp is one of the UK's most established and respected bridging loan companies. For more than 25 years the company has been providing 1st and 2nd charge bridging finance on residential properties in London and Southern England. Our bridging loans vary typically between £100,000 and £10 million, and we lend up to 70% value of the property secured on the property. And because you deal only with decision-makers, your bridging loan requirements are always dealt with quickly and with the minimum of fuss.

Why Fincorp for Bridging Loans?

We're a Principal Lender. Customers are able to get a decision quickly on their bridging loan without having to wait for authorisation from anyone else. And there's no back-tracking at a later date. So that means when we say yes to a loan, we mean it.

Our approach to business is summed up in two words, Clear and Simple. We believe that bridging lending is a straightforward business, all too often complicated by lenders with their lack of transparency and reliance on the small print. We work hard to make your dealings with us as clear and simple as possible.

Our Criteria

  • Principal Lender
  • 1st and 2nd Charges
  • London and South East
  • Residential properties
  • Bridging Loans from £100,000 - £10 million
  • Up to 70% LTV

Enquiry/Application for Individual Applicants

 

10 Top Tips for finding the right bridging lender

Latest News


Lenders are from Mars, brokers are from Venus


By Matthew Anderson, director, Fincorp

We all knew lenders and brokers sat on different sides of the fence but I was interested to see the findings of a straw poll done last month by Brightstar Financial managing director and chairman of the Association of Bridging Professionals (AOBP), Rob Jupp.

He asked bridging brokers what was important to them when arranging a deal for a client and found they ranked in order: certainty of funds and decision, rates and product, procuration fee, service, relationship and speed.

When he asked bridging lenders the same thing the answers were practically upside down with them ranking in order of priority: service, speed, relationship, rates and product, certainty of decision and funds and procuration fee last.

Perhaps I’m naïve to have thought lenders would be a bit more on the same page as brokers. It’s not really very surprising that brokers rank procuration fees higher than lenders but what was surprising to me was that certainty was right at the top of a broker’s list.

At Fincorp we look at a deal, make a decision and then stick to it. It really is that simple. So hearing that a lender’s reliability is so important makes me think that there are lenders out there failing to follow through on a decision in principle.

Bridge finance is pretty straightforward when you’ve been doing it for 25 years as we have at Fincorp. You look at the security, the terms, the borrower and then if you’re happy, you lend the money. A lender’s ability to do that relies on two things though: experience and investor confidence.

It’s a cliché but it’s true: it’s easy to lend money and much harder to get it back. But if your investors have confidence in your ability to underwrite a deal and bring their money back because experience tells them you will, then as a lender you’re always in a position to say yes to the broker and borrower and mean it.

I suspect that brokers’ frustration is that there are too many lenders out there saying yes and meaning maybe, maybe not. Nothing makes a broker more annoyed than having promised their client the deal is done and then having to go back to them empty handed. It’s humiliating.

More often than not it’s not even the broker’s fault but it is him (or her) who ends up running the risk of looking unprofessional when the lender fails to deliver. Particularly in the bridging market where deals need to be turned around pretty quickly and a loan that falls through can really put the screws on a client.

I’ve often thought the bridging market rather a cosy one with certain brokers frequently using the same clutch of lenders and lenders having their “favourite” brokers – some even going so far as to reward certain brokers with override commissions for bringing them a target amount of business.

It is interesting then that lenders view that dynamic as “strength of relationship” when brokers may in fact view it as reassurance they won’t let their client down.

From a broker’s point of view it has to be a balancing act between trying a new lender out to get better terms or a different appetite for specific types of deal and not getting burnt by a lender that might just be too good to be true. There is a large degree of uncertainty when you’re dealing with someone you don’t know and the risk is that it’s the client who suffers if the lender doesn’t deliver.

There’s no silver bullet for brokers faced with this conundrum – in a sense every deal is different and for that reason it’s impossible to know if a lender will approve it in the first place until you’ve tried them. But there are things brokers can do to help improve that certainty.

Choosing a lender that has a steady and large pool of funding and investors will greatly increase the chances they won’t renege on a decision in principle because a particular investor who had said they’d lend the cash has since bought a Ferrari or a racehorse. And choosing a lender that gives brokers access to its directors and underwriters is also critical because a salesman isn’t actually where the buck stops.

In some ways lenders do come from Mars and brokers from Venus. We are both obviously doing a different job. But we also have one very important thing in common: the client. Lenders may say service when brokers say certainty but what we both mean is doing a good and reliable job for the borrower.